I have started myself to shift from ChatGPT models because now they have started to go out of context for no reason.

You ask them to make a summary of what we have discussed on this chat so far and it fails to note the important points.

And if the chat is pretty lengthy, it just dismisses and gets bizarre info out of it.

I think I smell the commercialness of it spreading across the room.

I have had better output from the recent Microsoft's phi-4 model compared to 4o.

"Technology makes more and better jobs for horses"

Sounds ridiculous when you say it that way, but people believe this about humans all the time.

If an AI can do all jobs better than humans, for cheaper, without holidays or weekends or rights, it will replace all human labor.

We will need to come up with a completely different economic model to deal with the fact that anything humans can do, AIs will be able to do better. Including things like emotional intelligence, empathy, creativity, and compassion.

We learned a lot of lessons building our AI assistant, Pulumi Copilot. Here are some key insights:

1. Minimize LLM Usage: Let traditional code handle deterministic tasks, reserve LLMs for natural language work
2. Decompose into Skills: Break complex tasks into modular units that combine LLM and traditional code appropriately
3. Test Rigorously: Use multiple validation approaches, including LLMs testing LLMs
4. Learn from Hallucinations: Sometimes incorrect outputs reveal user expectations
5. Learn from Users Continuously: User interactions improve our AI systems - from training better skills to catching hallucinations and revealing product opportunities.

Here is the longer more detailed blog post. Be curious on yall's thoughts.

It’s easy to let concern over the impact of AI on human work turn into hysterical alarmism. But it’s also easy to let one’s avoidance of being seen as an alarmist allow one to slide into a kind of obstinate denialism about some legitimate concerns about AI having huge effects on life and the global economy in ways not always beneficial or evenly shared. What lots of people tend to do is console themselves by pointing out all of the things AI can’t do. But that’s a foolishly complacent line of thinking. Objects in the AI mirror are closer than they appear.

https://americandreaming.substack.com/p/objects-in-the-ai-mirror-are-closer